Annotated Bibliography

Secondary Acceleration


Adelman, C. (2006). The toolbox revisited: Paths to degree completion from high school through college. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Department of Education, Office of Vocational and Adult Education.

No abstract available.

Alltucker, M. M. (1924). Is the pedagogically accelerated student a misfit in the senior high school? The School Review, 32(3), 193-202.

No abstract available.

Bailey, T., & Karp, M. M. (2003). Promoting college access and success: A review of credit-based transition programs. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Department of Education, Office of Vocational and Adult Education.

No abstract available.

Barnett, E., Gardner, D., & Bragg, D. (2004). Dual credit in Illinois: Making it work. Champaign, IL: University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Office of Community College Research and Leadership.

No abstract available.

Benally, S. (2004). Serving American Indian students: Participation in accelerated learning opportunities. Boulder, CO: Western Interstate Commission for Higher Education.

No abstract available.

Botstein, L. (2003). Bard High School Early College. Peer Review, 5(2), 17-19.

Leon Botstein, Bard College and Simon’s Rock College of Bard’s president, describes the purpose and importance of Bard High School Early College (BHSEC), the nation’s only four-year liberal arts and sciences college specifically designed to allow highly motivated students to begin college after tenth or eleventh grade. BHSEC is a public school that opened in the fall of 2001 in Greenpoint, Brooklyn in New York. It is currently located in Manhattan. Students who complete BHSEC’s program receive an associate’s degree in liberal arts and sciences as well as a high school diploma. The school sets high standards for its students and emphasizes the importance of intellectual curiosity and personal motivation. Botstein contends that programs such as the Advanced Placement (AP) Program have low standards and do not meet students’ needs in part because of their focus on a single test at the end of the year. The faculty at BHSEC are Ph.D.s and teach classes in their field of interest. In Botstein’s experience, these faculty members tend to have an enthusiasm for their material that is absent in many AP classes.

Bragg, D. D., Kim, E., & Rubin, M. B. (2005, November). Academic pathways to college: Policies and practices of the fifty states to reach underserved students. Paper presented at the annual meeting of Association for the Study of Higher Education, Philadelphia, PA.

No abstract available.

Caplan, S. M., Henderson, C. E., Henderson, J., & Fleming, D. L. (2002). Socioemotional factors contributing to adjustment among early-entrance college students. Gifted Child Quarterly, 46(2), 124-134.

This study explored the role of self-concept and family environment variables in the psychosocial adjustment and academic achievement of 180 students (104 male, 76 female) at the Texas Academy of Mathematics and Science (TAMS), a residential early-entrance to college program in which students complete their junior and senior years of high school while earning 60 hours of college credit.

To explore the psychosocial adjustment of TAMS students, the researchers administered the Tennessee Self-Concept Scale as a composite measure of self-concept, the Family Environment Scale to assess perceptions of family environment, and the Student Adjustment to College Questionnaire (SACQ). First-semester GPA was the measure of academic achievement.

The results supported the hypothesis that adjustment to college and academic achievement may be predicted by a combination of family environment factors and overall self-concept. Specifically, adjustment to college (as measured by the SACQ) was predicted by overall self-concept and the Family Environment factors of family cohesion, conflict, and expressiveness. Academic achievement (first-semester GPA) was predicted by overall self-concept and the Family Environment factors of family cohesion, organization, control, and conflict.

While the authors stipulated that their findings might not be generalizable to other early-entrance to college programs, they suggested that measures of self-concept and family environment might provide useful information for early entrance programs. Programs might increase retention, support adjustment, and encourage academic achievement if they inform students and families about the role of family and self-concept factors.

Chmelynski, C. (2004). "Early college" high school jump-starts higher learning. Education Digest: Essential Readings Condensed for Quick Review, 69(7), 57-60.

The author explores high schools that work with local colleges to allow students to simultaneously pursue two-year college degrees and a high school diploma. Most of the schools highlighted in this article have received funding from the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation. Some prospective students for these programs are highly motivated students looking for acceleration, while others are at-risk students or dropouts. The schools create individualized programs that allow students to pursue areas of interest while completing the credits necessary to graduate from high school.

Students in these particular early college programs receive individual counseling and support and often attend tuition-free. Some programs offer students free transportation, use of a laptop, and/or textbooks. By providing more support and removing financial barriers to college, the Gates Foundation hopes to increase the percentage of low-income students who attend college.

The Gates Foundation has sponsored twenty-four new early college high schools and has plans to support over 150 schools around the country (as of 2004). The schools are generally located on or near college campuses, which gives students access to all of the colleges’ facilities. Admission into the programs varies by institution. Some require transcripts and interviews, others have residency requirements, and one featured program uses a lottery to admit students from over forty-five school districts. Most of the programs have around a ninety percent completion rate with a high percentage staying in college to continue their studies.

Cornell, D. G., Callahan, C. M., & Loyd, B. H. (1991). Personality growth of female early college entrants: A controlled, prospective study. Gifted Child Quarterly, 35(3), 135-143.

No abstract available.

Dougan, C. (2005). The pitfalls of college courses for high-school students. Chronicle of Higher Education, 52(10), B20.

No abstract available.

Dutkowsky, D. H., Evensky, J. M., & Edmonds, G. S. (2008). Should your high school adopt Advanced Placement or a concurrent enrollment program? An expected benefit approach. Retrieved June 4, 2008, from http://www-cpr.maxwell.syr.edu/efap/Publications/Should_Your_HSchool_Adopt.pdf

This study utilized simulations of an Expected Benefit model to quantitatively compare the relative benefits of two types of acceleration: Advanced Placement (AP) and Concurrent Enrollment Programs (CEP). While both AP and CEP can lead to high school students earning college credits for coursework completed while in high school, they differ in financial cost and the likelihood of obtaining college credit, thereby creating a need to compare the benefits of each.

To answer the research question “What model should an individual high school choose to offer for its students?” the authors use Expected Benefit – defined as the likelihood of achieving college credit at a given cost – as their dependent variable. Expected Benefit is calculated based on a formula that the researchers created and the data used in the simulation are drawn from the College Board for the AP and from Syracuse University for the CEP.

The results show that CEP placement is generally more appropriate for students who are planning on attending private undergraduate institutions and score within the average range on the AP test, while AP placement is generally more appropriate for students who have inexpensive access to a public undergraduate institution and/or score exceptionally well on the AP.

Eimers, M. T., & Mullen, R. (2003, May). Dual credit and Advanced Placement: Do they help prepare students for success in college? Paper presented at the meeting of the Association for Institutional Research Conference, Tampa, FL.

No abstract available.

Espenshade, T. J., Hale, L. E., & Chung, C. Y. (2005). The frog pond revisited: High school academic context, class rank, and elite college admission. Sociology of Education, 78, 269-293.

No abstract available.

Feldhusen, J. (1985, April). Alternatives for in-school programming designed to meet the cognitive and affective needs of gifted adolescents. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Chicago.

No abstract available.

Florida Board of Education. (2003, December). Study on acceleration mechanisms in Florida. Retrieved January 19, 2006, from http://www.firn.edu/doe/postsecondary/pdf/acc_accelerationstudy_1203.pdf

No abstract available.

Florida Department of Education. (2004, March). Dual enrollment students are more likely to enroll in postsecondary education (Fast Fact #79). Tallahassee, FL: Author.

No abstract available.

Fluitt, J. L., & Strickland, S. M. (1984). A survey of early admission policies and procedures. College and University, 59(2), 129-135.

No abstract available.

Geiser, S., & Santelices, V. (2004). The role of Advanced Placement and honors courses in college admissions. Research & Occasional Paper Series: CSHE.4.04.

No abstract available.

Gentry, M., & Owen, S. V. (2004). Secondary student perceptions of classroom quality: Instrumentation and differences between advanced/honors and nonhonors classes. The Journal of Secondary Gifted Education, 16(1), 20-29.

The current focus on testing in education has bypassed issues of student perceptions about school, which are related to student success, particularly in gifted education. Gentry and Owen created a new instrument, Student Perceptions of Classroom Quality (SPOCQ), in an attempt to measure this often-ignored aspect of education. They hope to eventually use the results to improve student achievement in both general and gifted education. In this study, SPOCQ was shown to effectively assess student perceptions of meaningfulness, challenge, choice, self-efficacy, and appeal of their education among advanced/honors and nonhonors students.

Gross, M. U. M, & Vliet, H. E. van (n.d.). Radical acceleration of highly gifted children: An annotated bibliography of international research on highly gifted children who graduate from high school three or more years early. Sydney, NSW: University of New South Wales, Resource and Information Centre.

No abstract available.

Harnish, D., & Lynch, R. L. (2005). Secondary to postsecondary technical education transitions: An exploratory study of dual enrollment in Georgia. Career and Technical Information Research, 30(3), 169-188.

No abstract available.

Hertberg-Davis, H., & Callahan, C. M. (2008). A narrow escape: Gifted students' perceptions of Advanced Placement and International Baccalaureate Programs. Gifted Child Quarterly, 52(3), 199-216.

No abstract available.

Hoffman, N. (2003). College credit in high school: Increasing college attainment rates for underrepresented students. Change, 35, 42-48.

No abstract available.

Hoffman, N. (2005, April). Add and subtract: Dual enrollment as a state strategy to increase postsecondary success for underrepresented students. Boston: Jobs for the Future.

No abstract available.

Hoffman, N., & Vargas, J. (2005, January). Integrating grades 9 through 14: State policies to support and sustain early college high schools. Boston: Jobs for the Future.

No abstract available.

Horn, L., & Kojaku, L. K. (2001). High school academic curriculum and the persistence path through college.Washington, DC: National Center for Education Statistics. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED456694)

No abstract available.

Hughes, K. L., Karp, M. M., Fermin, B. J., & Bailey, T. R. (2005). Pathways to college: Access and Success. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Department of Education, Office of Vocational and Adult Education.

No abstract available.

Hugo, E. B. (2001). Dual enrollment for underrepresented student populations. New Directions for Community Colleges, 113, 67-72.

No abstract available.

Janos, P. M., Robinson, N. M., Carter, C., Chapel, A., Cufley, R., Curland, M., et al. (1988). A cross-sectional developmental study of the social relations of students who enter college early. Gifted Child Quarterly, 32(1), 210-215.

No abstract available.

Karnes, F. A., & Chauvin, J. C. (1982). A survey of early admission policies for younger than average students: Implications for gifted youth. Gifted Child Quarterly, 26(2), 68-73.

No abstract available.

Karp, M. M., Bailey, T. R., Hughes, K. L., & Fermin, B. J. (2005). Update to state dual enrollment policies: Addressing access and quality. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education, Office of Vocational and Adult Education.

No abstract available.

Karp, M. M., Calcagno, J. C., Hughes, K .L., Jeong, D. W., & Bailey, T. R. (2007). The postsecondary achievement of participants in dual enrollment: An analysis of students outcomes in two states. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota, National Research Center for Career and Technical Education.

No abstract available.

Kleiner, B., & Lewis, L. (2005). Dual enrollment of high school students at postsecondary institutions, 2002-03. Washington, D.C.: National Center for Education Statistics.

No abstract available.

Klopfenstein, K., & Thomas, M. K. (2005, August). The link between Advanced Placement experience and college success. Retrieved October 13, 2005, from http://www.utdallas.edu/research/tsp/pdfpapers/newspaper1b.pdf

No abstract available.

Krueger, C. (2006, March). Dual enrollment: policy issues confronting state policymakers (Policy Brief: Dual/Concurrent Enrollment). Denver, CO: Education Commission of the States.

No abstract available.

Kyburg, R. M., Hertberg-Davis, H., & Callahan, C. M. (2007). Advanced Placement and International Baccalaureate programs: Optimal learning environments for talented minorities? Journal of Advanced Academics, 18(2), 172-215.

No abstract available.

Lee, S.-Y., & Olszewski-Kubilius, P. (2005). Investigation of high school credit and placement for summer coursework taken outside of local schools. Gifted Child Quarterly, 49(1), 37-50.

No abstract available.

Lerner, J. B., & Brand, B. (2006). The college ladder: Linking secondary and postsecondary education for success for all students. Washington, D.C.: American Youth Policy Forum.

No abstract available.

Lupkowski, A. E, Whitmore, M., & Ramsay, A. (1992). The impact of early entrance to college on self-esteem: A preliminary study. Gifted Child Quarterly, 36(2), 87-90.

No abstract available.

Lynch, R. L., Harnish, D., Fletcher, G., Thornton, G., & Thompson, J. (2007). Dual enrollment in high schools and technical colleges of Georgia: Final report. Athens, GA: University of Georgia, Occupational Research Group.

No abstract available.

Marcel, K. W. (2003). Online Advanced Placement classes: Experiences of rural and low-income high school students. Boulder, CO: Western Interstate Commission for Higher Education. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED478377)

No abstract available.

Marcel, K. W. (2004). Using technology to increase access to accelerated learning opportunities in four states. Boulder, CO: Western Interstate Commission for Higher Education.

No abstract available.

Marcy, M. B. (2008). The early college moment. Retrieved November 20, 2008, from Bard College at Simon's Rock, Newsroom Web site: https://www.simons-rock.edu/newsroom/newsroom-archive/perspectives/early-college-moment

No abstract available.

Martinez, M., & Klopott, S. (2005). The link between high school reform and college access and success for low-income and minority youth. Washington, D.C.: American Youth Policy Forum and Pathways to College Network.

No abstract available.

Matthews, J. (2006). Why AP matters. Newsweek, 147(19), 63-64.

No abstract available.

Mercurio, J. A. (1982). College courses in the high school: A four-year follow-up of the Syracuse University Class of 1977. College and University, 58(1), 5–18.

No abstract available.

Morrison, M. C. (2008). The strategic value of dual enrollment programs. Techniques: Connecting education and careers, 83(7), 26-27.

No abstract available.

Muratori, M., Colangelo, N., & Assouline, S. (2003). Early-entrance students: Impressions of their first semester of college. Gifted Child Quarterly, 47(3), 219-238.

No abstract available.

Museus, S. D., Lutovsky, B. R., & Colbeck, C. L. (2007). Access and equity in dual enrollment programs: Implications for policy formation. Higher Education in Review, 4, 1-19.

No abstract available.

Nathan, J., Accomando, L., & Fitzpatrick, D. H. (2005). Stretching minds and resources: 20 years of postsecondary enrollment options in Minnesota. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota, Center for School Change, Hubert H. Humphrey Institute of Public Affairs.

No abstract available.

Noble, K. D., & Childers, S. A. (2008). A passion for learning: The theory and practice of optimal match at the University of Washington. Journal of Advanced Academics, 19(2), 236-270.

No abstract available.

Noble, K. D., & Smyth, R. K. (1995). Keeping their talents alive: Young women's assessment of radical, post-secondary acceleration. Roeper Review, 18(1), 49-55.

No abstract available.

Noble, K. D., Childers, S. A., & Vaughan, R. C. (2008). A place to be celebrated and understood: The impact of early university entrance from parents' points of view. Gifted Child Quarterly, 52(3), 256-268.

No abstract available.

Noble, K. D., Vaughan, R. C., Chan, C., Childers, S., Chow, B., Federow, A., et al. (2007). Love and work: The legacy of early university entrance. Gifted Child Quarterly, 51(2), 152-166.

No abstract available.

Olson, L. (2006). As "accelerated learning" booms, high school-college divide blurs. Education Week, 25(41), 1-18.

No abstract available.

Olszewski-Kubilius, P. (1999). Thinking through early entrance to college. Retrieved March 26, 2002, from Northwestern University, Centre for Talent Development Web site: http://www.ctd/northwestern.education/resources.

No abstract available.

Olszewski-Kubilius, P., & Lee, S.-Y. (2004). Gifted adolescents' talent development through distance learning. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 28(1), 7-35.

No abstract available.

Perkins, G. R., & Windham, P. (2002). Dual enrollment as an acceleration mechanism: Are students prepared for subsequent courses? Visions: The Journal of Applied Research for the Florida Association of Community Colleges, 3(1), 55-60.

No abstract available.

Peter, K. (2005). The road less traveled? Students who enroll in multiple institutions. Washington, D.C.: National Center for Education Statistics.

No abstract available.

Peters, S. J., & Mann, R. L. (2009). Getting ahead: Current secondary and postsecondary acceleration options for high-ability students in Indiana. Journal of Advanced Academics, 20(4), 630-660.

No abstract available.

Plucker, J. A., Chien, R. W., & Zaman, K. (2006). Enriching the high school curriculum through postsecondary credit-based transition programs (Education Policy Brief Volume 4, Number 2). Bloomington, IN: Center for Evaluation and Education Policy.

No abstract available.

Porter, R. M. (2003). A study of students attending Tennessee Board of Regents Universities who participated in high school dual enrollment programs. Ed.D. dissertation, East Tennessee State University. Retrieved June 9, 2008, from ProQuest Digital Dissertations database. (Publication No. AAT 3083438).

No abstract available.

Reis, S. M., & Westberg, K. L. (1994). An examination of current school district policies: Acceleration of secondary students. Journal of Secondary Gifted Education, 5(4), 7-18.

No abstract available.

Robinson, N. M., & Harsin, C. (2002). Considering the options: A guidebook for investigating early college entrance. Nevada: Davidson Institute for Talent Development.

No abstract available.

Robinson, N., & Noble, K. (1992). Acceleration: Valuable high school to college option. Gifted Child Today, 15(2), 20-23.

No abstract available.

Shaunessy, E., Suldo, S. M., Hardesty, R. B., & Shaffer, E. J. (2006). School functioning and psychological well-being of International Baccalaureate and general education students: A preliminary examination. The Journal of Secondary Gifted Education, 17(2), 76-89.

The study aimed to explore the school and psychosocial functioning of 33 gifted and 89 high-achieving students enrolled in the International Baccalaureate (IB) Diploma Programme compared to that of 176 general education students in the same school, a public high school located in a rural county in the southeastern United States. IB students who were not identified as gifted were categorized as high-achieving learners. The high school offered both an IB high school and a general education high school in a single school building, with each program having its own faculty and staff. The study tested the overall effect of group membership (IB-gifted, IB-high-achieving, or general education) on academic functioning, life satisfaction, and psychopathology. IB classes allow students to learn advanced content and skills at an age or grade earlier than expected, making them a form of acceleration. IB students tend to be highly self-motivated and meet or exceed school expectations, usually scoring above the 90th percentile on achievement tests.

Much of the information was collected through a survey. Teachers in both parts of the high school sent home letters regarding the study. Students who returned signed parent consent forms then completed questionnaires in groups of fifty to one hundred.

Indicators of adolescent functioning were organized in the following three areas: academic functioning, emotional distress, and psychological well-being. To assess academic functioning, the authors of the study use the School Climate Scale (SCS) and the Self-Efficacy Questionnaire for Children (SEQ-C). Indicators of academic function were also ascertained from archival school records (GPA, attendance, and discipline referrals during the semester). To assess psychological well-being, the Students’ Life Satisfaction Scale, Multidimensional Students’ Life Satisfaction Scale, and The Youth Self-Report of the Child Behavior Checklist were administered.

In four of six aspects of school climate, students in the IB program reported more positive perceptions of the crucial aspects of school climate than did their peers in the general education program. GPA, academic self-efficacy, attendance, and discipline referrals were significantly affected by group membership, with the strongest effect on GPA. Satisfaction with friends, self, school, living environment, and family were also significantly affected by group membership. In particular, gifted students in IB classes reported much higher levels of satisfaction with their friendships than their peers in general education. Psychopathology and problematic peer relations were significantly altered by group membership, with students in general education exhibiting more aggression and rule-breaking behaviors than either of other groups.

While the benefits of the IB program appear to include superior social functioning and psychological wellness, it is difficult to determine whether these benefits were a byproduct of the well-planned IB program or a result of other factors (preexisting student characteristics, teacher expectations, etc.). The study lacks non-accelerated gifted students as a control, and so has little to say about the effects of not accelerating a gifted student. The study also is not necessarily generalizeable to other IB school programs or other advanced curriculum because of its limited and specific scope. More studies are necessary to better understand the effects of IB and other advanced curriculum on gifted and high-achieving students. Other limitations of the current study include the relatively small size of the gifted sample, the low rate of participation from the general education students, and the cross-sectional design.

The authors suggest that, in addition to the training the IB program already provides in content-area test preparation and related exams, the program should provide training on the affective needs of gifted and high-ability students. The study’s authors conclude that the match between the academic demands of the IB program and the IB students’ abilities may have facilitated psychological wellness. Because students participating in an IB program showed similar or superior levels of psychosocial adjustment in comparison to general education peers, the IB program appears well-suited for gifted students and possibly all students with high achievement needs and academic values.

Shaw, J. S. (1974). Speeded-up, souped-up and skip-a-year programs get kids into -- and out of -- college sooner. Nation's Schools and Colleges, 1(2), 35-42.

No abstract available.

Shepard, S. J., Nicpon, M. F., & Doobay, A. F. (2009). Early entrance to college and self-concept: Comparisons across the first semester of enrollment. Journal of Advanced Academics, 21(1), 40-57.

You can read the full article here.

Shireman, R. (2004). "Rigorous courses" and student achievement in high school: An options paper for the governor of California (Research and Occasional Paper Series: CSHE.13.04). Berkeley: University of California. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED492333)

No abstract available.

Spurling, S., & Gabriner, R. (2002). The effect of concurrent enrollment programs upon student success at City College of San Francisco: Findings. City College of San Francisco, Office of Research, Planning and Grants.

No abstract available.

Stanley, J., & Benbow, C.P. (1983). Extremely young college graduates: Evidence of their success. American Association of Collegiate Registrars and Admissions Officers, 58, 361-371.

No abstract available.

Taylor, M. L., & Porath, M. (2006). Reflections on the International Baccalaureate Program: Graduates' perspectives. The Journal of Secondary Gifted Education, 17(3), 21-30.

No abstract available.

Treviño, A., & Mayes, C. (2006). Creating a bridge from high school to college for Hispanic students. Multicultural Education, 14(2), 74-77.

No abstract available.

Vanderbrook, C. M. (2006). Intellectually gifted females and their perspectives of lived experience in the AP and IB programs. The Journal of Secondary Gifted Education, 17(3), 133-148.

No abstract available.

VanTassel-Baska, J. (2004). Quo vadis? Laboring in the classical vineyards: An optimal challenge for gifted secondary students. The Journal of Secondary Gifted Education, 15(2), 56-60.

No abstract available.

Waits, T., Setzer, J. C., & Lewis, L. (2005). Dual credit and exam-based courses in U.S. public high schools: 2002-03. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Department of Education, Institute of Education Sciences, National Center for Education Statistics.

No abstract available.

Western Interstate Commission for High Education. (2006). Accelerated learning options: Moving the needle on access and success: A study of state and institutional policies and practices. Boulder, CO: Author.

No abstract available.

Wilkins, W. L. (1936). The social adjustment of accelerated pupils. The School Review, 44(6), 445-455.

No abstract available.

Wlodkowski, R. J. (2003). Accelerated learning in colleges and universities. New Directions for Adult and Continuing Education, 97, 5-15.

No abstract available.